Buyer Chains · CASE STUDY 005 · Pre-market stage
Holyvolt × an unnamed cell buyer × a procurement rule: buy the lab first, promise the market in 2027
The question · The buyer is not yet named, but the procurement rule is. Who validates a cathode that is due on the market in 2027?
At a glance · $45M raised and a 2027 market date; DRX performance figures disclosed: none.
One of the Buyer Chains series. Each piece follows one chain, the AI company, its customer and sometimes the customer's customer, through five roles in the public record: who states the need, who sets the research direction, who runs the experiments, who validates the result, who decides to keep paying. It records only what the public record states and says who said each thing; a missing step is marked not yet public rather than filled in, and a company's own figure is written as the company's. The timeline at the end stays open: when the chain's next step reaches the public record, it goes on as a new line.
Holyvolt is a battery-materials company headquartered in Stockholm with its lab in San Diego. In 2026 it merged with Wildcat Discovery Technologies, a high-throughput battery-testing lab founded by the chemist Peter G. Schultz and run for 18 years; the company says the platform has run over 225 projects for over 85 customers, nearly a dozen of them Fortune 500 companies including BMW, and holds data on over 500,000 physical cells and over 165 million cycles.[1] On 15 October 2026 it announced $45M from Zone II, CC.VC and a handful of angels, to expand its AI models, lab capacity and team and to take its first material, DRX (a disordered rocksalt cathode with no nickel or cobalt), toward commercial deployment: the company plans to begin commercialising DRX in 2027, starting with defence and then larger mobility markets.[1] What sets this chain apart is the order: it bought the data and the lab first and trained on them afterwards. Its buyer has no name in the public record yet; what has a name is a procurement rule.
Who states the need · A rule, and the buyers behind it. The release is precise: from 1 October 2027 the Pentagon can no longer procure batteries from CATL, BYD and four other named manufacturers, while the US military is expanding its use of drones.[1] Which drone or cell maker has stated a requirement is not yet public.
Who sets the direction · Holyvolt. The DRX family, the choice to avoid nickel and cobalt, the raw materials sourced outside China: all the company's; its AI models pick what the lab makes and cycles next.[1]
Who runs the experiments · Holyvolt's own lab, the former Wildcat platform in San Diego, which puts research, materials development and pilot production under one roof; all DRX development happens there.[1]
Who validates · Not yet public. The record reads that DRX data has been shown at scientific conferences, the International Battery Conference in March 2026 among them; no customer or third-party validation is public.[2] The company says the lab delivers results ten times faster than conventional R&D and the AI loop makes it a hundred times faster; when the record read Fortune's report, the ten-times figure came from one customer case study and the hundred-times figure is the company's own.[1][2]
Who decides to keep paying · So far the investors: Zone II, CC.VC and the angels; the $245M valuation Fortune reports comes from a person it does not name.[2] Wildcat's 85 customers over 18 years bought testing services, not a material. Whether a buyer pays for DRX is a 2027 question.
What the buyer looks at, concretely
- Battery buyers' acceptance criteria are among the most public in any industry. The US Advanced Battery Consortium (USABC) writes its EV cell targets as numbers: 1,000 DST cycles at 100% fast charge, 15-year calendar life, 300 Wh/kg, $60/kWh at 250,000 units; the test procedures are IEC 62660-1 (performance) and IEC 62619 (industrial cell safety).[3] Defence drone specifications are not public, but they turn on the same four things: cycle life, energy density, safety, cost.
- Holyvolt's own public material carries none of those numbers for DRX: the release says "high energy density" and nickel- and cobalt-free, with no Wh/kg, cycle count or cost.[1]
- So the next thing to look for in this chain is specific: a named cell maker or defence buyer that has tested DRX to its own specification and said what it found.
Not yet public · Any DRX performance figure; a customer; the price paid for Wildcat; whether "begin commercialising" in 2027 means samples, a small batch or volume; the basis of the valuation.
Decision point · The next decision belongs to a cell maker or a defence buyer: whether to test DRX to its own specification. That buyer has no name in the public record yet, and the procurement rule takes effect on 1 October 2027.
The chain's timeline
- 2026Holyvolt merges with Wildcat Discovery Technologies, taking its lab and 18 years of data (company release)[1]
- 2026-03DRX data shown at the International Battery Conference (the record)[2]
- 2026-10$45M raised; DRX to begin commercialisation in 2027, defence first (company release)[1]
- NextA named buyer tests DRX to its specification; DRX's Wh/kg, cycle life and cost made public. Awaiting public data.
- 2027-10-01The procurement rule takes effect: the date the company's own schedule has to meet.
- LaterThe first DRX order.
Sources
- Holyvolt press release, "Holyvolt Raises $45M to Scale AI-Powered Discovery Engine as the West Races to Develop New Battery Materials", 2026-10-15 (WebWire). webwire.com ↗ (read in full)
- Timeline entry holyvolt-45m-ai-battery-materials (Fortune's 2026-10-15 report was read for that entry; not reread for this piece).
- USABC, "USABC Goals for Advanced Batteries for Light Duty Electric Vehicles", 2025-10-06 revision; IEC 62660-1:2018; IEC 62619:2022.

